For serious athletes

Bring Joe one question worth measuring.

Start with one movement, one constraint, or one competition-relevant uncertainty. Joe investigates where usable force may be lost, tests a targeted change, and interprets the result without pretending every athlete needs the same answer.

Not ready to apply? Take the 60-second fit check
  • Application-based
  • Measurement-first
  • Coach-compatible
  • No guaranteed outcomes
Athlete investigationQuestion active
Current inquiryWhere does produced force stop becoming usable force?
contact windowretest peak
01Define
02Measure
03Test
04Retest
Entry pointOne bounded assessment
Primary evidenceVideo and measurement
Operating postureSpecific and reversible
ImplementationReturned to athlete and coach
Dr. J. L. Natale demonstrating movement and weight transfer on a field.

Applied work begins with the athlete in front of Joe, not with a generic template.

Fit before scope

This is specialist work, not another training subscription.

The strongest applications arrive with a real question, enough context to examine it, and a willingness to let evidence determine what happens next.

Strong fit
  • One specific movement or performance question.
  • Footage, context, and a clear competition or training goal.
  • Willing to test a targeted change, not chase a universal cue.
  • Value measurement, even when it challenges your assumptions.
Probably not the right service
  • Want a generic conditioning plan or motivational coaching.
  • Need medical diagnosis, injury treatment, or rehab.
  • Expect a guaranteed result before any assessment.
  • Unwilling to involve your coach on implementation.

Questions Joe may investigate

The athlete does not need the answer. The athlete needs a useful question.

These public research questions show the territory. An assessment narrows the work to the movement, evidence, and decision that matter for the individual athlete.

The investigation

Evidence before prescription.

The process is designed to avoid turning the first plausible explanation into a permanent training belief. A targeted change earns its place by surviving a retest.

01

Define the performance question

Agree on one bounded, competition-relevant question worth investigating.

02

Observe and measure the movement

Use video and measurement to see where usable force may be lost.

03

Test a targeted technical change

Introduce a specific, reversible change and observe its effect.

04

Retest and interpret the result

Compare against the baseline and interpret honestly, including null results.

05

Return practical findings

Hand implementation ownership back to the athlete and coach with clear options.

What you receive

Your Force Signature

Maximizing force doesn't mean swinging harder. It means more of you arriving at the target. Measured, not guessed.

Every athlete who works with Joe leaves with their own analysis: your strikes, measured and mapped, benchmarked against the group, and turned into a concrete path for improvement. The next session can then prove whether the change worked.

  • 01
    Every strike, measured

    Force traces of each impact event: what your effort actually delivered, strike by strike.

  • 02
    Peak force, benchmarked

    Your maximum strikes against the group average and the group max, so you see where you stand, not where you feel.

  • 03
    The milliseconds at contact

    How long your force spends in contact with the target: the invisible window where power transfers or leaks.

  • 04
    A measurable path forward

    A baseline to retest against. Change something, measure again, and know it worked. Not hope.

Individual analysis — sample page

Force at impact, strike by strike

MEASURED
time at impact — millisecondsforcecontact windowgroup avgpeak force
Impact events7 strikes
Mean contact time202 ms
Benchmarkvs. group avg & max
Illustrative sample from a real athlete assessment, shared with permission. Sample figures are measurements, not promised outcomes. Sensors, algorithms, and protocols remain confidential.

In their words

What athletes find once they can see the numbers.

The analysis of where I get power when I jab was really interesting. It surprised me to learn I get power out of my rear leg. Learning the actual force in my strikes gave me a new perspective on how hard they land.

My favorite part was how much data gets recorded and how fast it's analyzed: time between punches, impact force, contact time on the target, even how a strike changes with a roll of the wrist. I'd recommend it to anyone.

DanMMA athlete · 11–20 years

With 15+ years in martial arts you see a lot of versions of the same punch. Being able to see a baseline of where you start, and to break down each part of your punch, is a game changer.

It gives you the ability to build a plan to improve the fundamentals and reach the power and speed you want. The experience was fantastic. I'd recommend it to others, and I'm looking forward to seeing how much the data changes next time.

RobertMartial artist · 15+ years

Dr. Natale was great at helping me break down how to generate more force on my strikes: how to connect and disconnect my lower and upper body, when to use them together and when to separate.

He gave me many at-home drills to improve. The slow-motion videos and in-person breakdown have truly been a game changer.

KenCombat sports & strength coach · pro linebacker

Shared with permission. Individual experiences from real assessments; results vary and are not guaranteed.

Find your track

Where does the strike break down?

Most athletes fight for 1–3% at the margins. The larger gain is usually force you already produce that never reaches the target, and that's where each 2X track begins. Read across, and find the one that sounds like you.

Depth of engagement

Start bounded. Go deeper only when the diagnostic justifies it.

The 2X architecture represents different technical priorities and levels of engagement. It is not a promise that every athlete needs, or qualifies for, every level.

Every engagement begins with your Force Signature. Your strikes, measured, mapped, and benchmarked against the group.

01

2X Stealth · Foundational

Strikers who want speed and disguise before adding load.

Problem
Power that arrives late or telegraphs, giving opponents time to read it.
Scope
Manage technique and muscle tension to increase strike speed, reduce telegraphing, and improve striking economy.
Format
Assessment plus targeted technical work.
Eligibility
Application-based. Best after a baseline assessment.

Scope and fees are proposed only after fit and requirements are understood.

Apply for an Assessment
02Start with the numbers

2X Force · Standard

Athletes ready to put measured numbers on their striking power.

Problem
Effort that is produced but not transferred into the target.
Scope
Measure delivered force and work to raise it against a defined baseline, tracking progress in bodyweight-relative terms.
Format
Assessment, measurement, and retesting.
Eligibility
Application-based. Requires measurement access.

Scope and fees are proposed only after fit and requirements are understood.

Apply for an Assessment
03

2X Mass · Advanced

Athletes chasing 'hit like a heavyweight' at their own weight.

Problem
Only a fraction of body mass ends up behind the strike.
Scope
Incorporate more full-body effective mass into strikes through alignment, timing, and impact mechanics.
Format
Custom, multi-session applied work.
Eligibility
Proposed only when the diagnostic justifies advanced work.

Scope and fees are proposed only after fit and requirements are understood.

Apply for an Assessment
Not ready to apply? Take the 60-second fit check
  • Applying is free
  • No obligation
  • You may leave with just a baseline, no upsell

No automatic upsell.

An athlete may leave with a useful baseline and no recommendation for deeper work. A larger engagement should be a consequence of the evidence and the athlete’s objective, not a predetermined sales path.

Working relationship

Specialist depth without taking the athlete away from the coach.

Joe’s role is deliberately bounded. He investigates the question and returns evidence, interpretation, and options to the athlete and coach.

Joe

Investigates the defined question

Joe frames the problem, observes the movement, interprets the available evidence, and proposes bounded technical tests.

Athlete

Supplies context and executes the test

You bring the objective, footage, training history, and honest feedback required to make the investigation useful.

Coach

Retains implementation ownership

Your coach remains responsible for the wider program. Findings return to the athlete-coach relationship as evidence and options.

See the work

What Techanique actually does.

Before applying, watch Joe explain the work in his own words. The page describes the structure; the film shows the tone and practical orientation behind it.

What we ACTUALLY do at Techanique Consulting

A 60-second look at the work.

Expectation control

Clear about what the work can and can't establish.

Serious measurement includes uncertainty, null results, athlete variability, and the possibility that the initial explanation is wrong.

What Joe commits to

A disciplined investigation

  • A defined question and agreed scope.
  • Honest interpretation of the evidence.
  • Targeted changes you can retest.
  • Respect for the athlete-coach relationship.
What is not promised

A predetermined result

  • No guaranteed force, speed, or ranking.
  • No claim that one method fits everyone.
  • No medical diagnosis or treatment.
  • No deeper work unless the evidence justifies it.

Techanique provides performance and technique analysis. It does not provide medical diagnosis or treatment. Any injury or medical information is handled only as needed and does not imply a medical service.

Questions, answered

The questions Joe hears most, before you apply.

Practice

How is this different from hiring a personal trainer?

There's no long-term lock-in and no per-session billing. Joe takes on a defined problem, solves it, and hands you back to your own training. You keep your coach; you add a specialist for the question that's been stuck.

Do I have to commit to more than one track?

No. You take one track at a time. The three tracks are designed to reinforce each other, but each one stands on its own.

What happens when I finish a track?

You're free to take what you've learned and go, or start another track when you're ready. There's no obligation to continue.

What does “graduation” mean?

You graduate a track when you complete its full cycle. Working through all three opens the door to further work together.

Methods

Will you change my style or my art?

No. Keep your technique. Joe works to enhance how you express it, whether that's boxing, muay thai, kung fu, taekwondo, or karate.

Isn't this karate-based?

Joe's methods grew out of a hard-hitting karate lineage, where he first developed his research approach. The principles of force transfer apply across every striking art.

What kind of exercises or protocols do you use?

A hands-on approach inside your own training environment: targeted testing and drills built around the specific question you bring, not a generic program.

Results

I already hit hard. Why would I need this?

Fair. So let's measure it. Even strong, experienced athletes are usually leaving usable force on the table without knowing it. The point isn't to doubt your power; it's to show you where more of it can actually land.

Are your metrics validated?

Validation is in progress. Joe is documenting the methods as journal-style papers so the work can be reviewed and, in time, published. Public pages describe the questions; the methods stay confidential until they're validated.

How can you add “effective mass”?

Effective mass isn't about gaining bodyweight. It's about how much of your body actually arrives at the moment of contact, and most athletes deliver only a fraction of theirs. Feel the difference once, and the physics makes sense.

Athlete application

Define the question that matters now.

The application is not a checkout. It gives Joe enough context to decide whether there is a useful, bounded investigation to propose.

01
Joe reviews the application

Fit, question quality, available material, timing, and scope are considered personally.

02
A bounded first step is proposed

Acceptance does not automatically mean a long engagement. The initial scope is defined first.

03
Terms and inputs are confirmed

Required footage, attendance, coach involvement, confidentiality, scheduling, and fees are agreed.

04
The investigation begins

The work starts from a baseline and proceeds through observation, testing, retesting, and interpretation.

Athlete assessment

Bring Joe a question worth measuring.

Every application is reviewed personally. Submitting does not guarantee acceptance.